Chavarria v. MacIas’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1993
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Zapp · Wagner v. Riske · Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Canty · Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Roberts · Williams v. Wyrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The court had the power to enter the judgment nunc pro tunc. The court on October 11th announced its rulings on all issues and parties and rendered the judgment. The remaining act of signing and entering the nunc pro tunc judgment, though after term time, was in accord with the settled law of the State. Williams v. Wyrick, Tex.Sup., 245 S.W.2d 961 ; Gulf C. & S. F. Ry. v. Canty, 115 Tex. 537 , 285 S.W. 296, 302 ; Wright v. Longhorn Drilling Corp., Tex.Civ.App., 202 S.W.2d 285 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.