¶1 ORDER
¶2 Charles Samuels appeals his convictions for two counts of felony murder for his role in aiding the murders of Ernest Wilson and Quentin Chandler. He does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. In two points raised under plain error Samuels argues that the prosecutor misstated the law during closing argument and that the applicable MAI-Cr definition of reasonable doubt is unconstitutional. Having reviewed the record, we find no plain error.
¶3 As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided for the benefit of the par *243 ties, and the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).