In Re Tiffany’s Empirical Analysis
252 U.S. 32 · 1920
Citation profile
112 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 191 later decisions (41 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1992 · most notably Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis (1978), Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger (1955)
112 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Krippendorf v. Hyde · In the Matter of Albertn Moore an Infant by Next Friend · Re Metropolitan Railway Receivership · Ex parte Harding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 191 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The words `final decision in the district court,' mean the same thing as `final judgments and decrees' as used in former acts regulating appellate jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““It is well settled that where a party has the right to a writ of error or appeal, resort may not be had to the extraordinary writ of mandamus or prohibition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.