Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 252 Va. 113 - Griswold v. Commonwealth

Griswold v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Argersinger v. Hamlin · Burgett v. Texas · Scott v. Illinois · Nichols v. United States · Commonwealth v. Ellett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the prior offense must be charged and proven”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Neither party cites, and we are unable to find, any case in which the United States Supreme Court has decided this issue. However, in Nichols , the Supreme Court decided that an uncounseled misdemeanor conviction resulting only in a fine could be used to enhance the punishment for a subsequent conviction. There, we think the Supreme Court made it plain, if it had not done so already, that there is no constitutional right to counsel in a misdemeanor case unless the conviction results in an "actual imprisonment." [ Id. at 117, 472 S.E.2d 789 .][ [14] ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unconstitutional and cannot be used... to ... enhance punishment for a subsequent [driving under the influence] conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.