Tittsworth v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Woods v. Mendez (2003), John v. Wong Shik Im (2002)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tarmac Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Smiley Block Co. · Cassady v. Martin · Grasty v. Tanner · Doe v. Thomas · Ring v. Poelman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]xpert testimony . . . cannot be speculative or founded upon assumptions that have an insufficient factual basis.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is speculative, is founded upon assumptions lacking a sufficient factual basis, relies upon dissimilar tests, and contains too many disregarded variables”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“liberalized the admissibility of expert testimony,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Toraish v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.