¶1OPINION OF THE COURT
¶2Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on September 10, 1976, and formerly maintained an office in Williamsville. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with three counts of professional misconduct.
¶3Respondent has admitted the material allegations of the petition.
¶4In mitigation, we note respondent’s prior unblemished record and that no client suffered a financial loss as a result of *155respondent’s misconduct. Accordingly, we conclude that respondent should be censured.
¶5Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ., concur.
¶6Order of censure entered.