Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 ALA 238 - Stickney v. Haas

Stickney v. Haas’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1975
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jenkins v. Harrison · Hooper v. Savannah & Memphis Railroad · Pearce v. Third Ave. Improvement Co. · Kludt v. Connett · Goodlett v. Hansell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under our statute (§ 73, Title 34, Code 1940) a married woman, living with her husband, the husband being of sound mind and a resident of this state, is without power to alienate her land, or any interest therein, without the assent and concurrence of the husband, expressed in writing, and contracts for the sale of her lands made by her without the assent and concurrence of her husband in the manner required by that statute, are void. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.