Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 ALA 271 - Peach v. Drennen

Peach v. Drennen’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1981
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1981

10 state decisions

401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cogburn v. Callier · Crossland v. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery · Catts v. Phillips · Alabama City G. & A. Ry. Co. v. Bates · Wade v. Kay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Though the lien is given on suits as well as judgments and decrees it is clear that there can be no enforcement of such a lien until the suit has been prosecuted to judgment.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny lien may be enforced in the manner provided by statute, if so provided , or in equity. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.