Fleschner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1974
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Orman v. Bishop · Credit v. State · Ballew v. State · Carney v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The basis of this complaint [point on appeal] was not asserted among the several allegations contained in appellant’s pro se petition for post conviction relief. Ark. Stat. Ann. (1971 Supp.), Criminal Procedure Rule I, p. 107, (H) provides: ‘All grounds for relief available to a prisoner under this rule must be raised in his original or amended petition’. Nor can a ground for relief which is available to a petitioner be raised for the first time on appeal. Orman v. Bishop, 245 Ark. 887 , 435 S.W. 2d 440 (1968); Credit v. State, 247 Ark. 424 , 445 S.W. 2d 718 (1969); Ballew v. State, 249 Ark. 480 , 459 S.W. 2d 577 (1970); Carney v. State, 250 Ark. 205 , 464 S.W. 2d 612 (1971).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bailey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.