Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 Ark. 589 - Childs v. Philpot

Childs v. Philpot’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2009

2 district · 18 state decisions

901972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mellon v. Arkansas Land & Lumber Co. · El Ranco, Inc. v. First National Bank of Nevada · Schiele v. Dillard · Midland Valley Railroad v. Ennis · Davis v. Chrisp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before an equitable estoppel may be applied, the party asserting estoppel must have relied to his detriment or prejudice upon the representations, acts or conduct of the one against whom estoppel is invoked. Bowlin v. Keifer, 246 Ark. 693 , 440 S.W.2d 232 . In other words, the courts of Arkansas generally will not apply an equitable estoppel unless the actions or conduct relied upon caused the innocent party to assume a different position than he would otherwise have or it would be otherwise inequitable to permit the person estopped to change his position.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “who can discharge the claim on which suit is brought, and not necessarily the person ultimately entitled to the benefit of recovery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “wholly upon equitable principles ... and should be applied only where there are equitable grounds for doing so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.