Brasher v. McGregor (In Re Brasher)’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Sorenson v. Secretary of the Treasury · 602 So. 2d 344 - IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc. · Matter of Davis · In Re Brown · In Re Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the fact that the Alabama legislature employed modifying terms [such as `under this chapter'] for `public assistance' in some sections of the title but not in § 38-4-8 is more plausibly read as a deliberate choice not to limit the breadth of the public-assistance exemption in § 38-4-8.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. James v. D G“all amounts paid or payable as public assistance to needy persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. James v. D G
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.