In Re Computer Dynamics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 28 U.S.C. § 158 · 28 U.S.C. § 453 · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Liteky et al United States · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · Kuntz v. City of Dayton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is subject to procedural due process requirements, including notice and an opportunity to be heard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allen v. Fitzgerald“possess ‘the inherent authority to disbar or suspend lawyers from practice’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.