Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 CONN 1 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

124
cited by 124 later decisions
5
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

123 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 124 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Reynolds (2003), State v. Courchesne (2003)

123 state decisions

690200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · McCarthy v. United States · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Sanders v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In general, the only allowable challenges after a plea are those relating either to the voluntary and intelligent nature of the plea or the exercise of the trial court's jurisdiction.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"(1) The plea was accepted without substantial compliance with [Practice Book § ] 39-19 ; "(2) The plea was involuntary, or it was entered without knowledge of the nature of the charge or without knowledge that the sentence actually imposed could be imposed; "(3) The sentence exceeds that specified in a plea agreement which had been previously accepted, or in a plea agreement on which the judicial authority had deferred its decision to accept or reject the agreement at the time the plea of guilty was entered; "(4) The plea resulted from the denial of effective assistance of counsel; "(5) There was no factual basis for the plea; or "(6) The plea either was not entered by a person authorized to act for a corporate defendant or was not subsequently ratified by a corporate defendant."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) The nature of the charge to which the plea is offered;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.