King v. Sultar’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
73 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Caruso v. City of Bridgeport (2008), Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. (2000)
73 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on LeConche v. Elligers · In re Baby Girl B. · Bakelaar v. City of West Haven · State v. Salmon · Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fundamental test for establishing classical aggrievement is well settled: [F]irst, the party claiming aggrievement must successfully demonstrate a specific personal and legal interest in the subject matter of the decision. . . . Second, the party claiming aggrievement also must demonstrate that its asserted interest has been specially and injuriously affected in a way that is cognizable by law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hen any injury for which compensation is payable under the provisions of this chapter has been sustained under circumstances creating in a person other CT Page 5847 than an employer . . . a legal liability to pay damages for the injury, the injured employee may claim compensation . . . but the injured employee may proceed at law against such person to recover damages for the injury; and any employer or the custodian of the Second Injury Fund, having paid, or having become obligated to pay, compensation under the provisions of the chapter may bring an action against such person to recover any amount that he has paid or has become obligated to pay as compensation to the injured employee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If the employee, the employer or the custodian of the Second Injury Fund brings an action against [a third party], he shall immediately notify the others, in writing , by personal representation or by registered or certified mail, of the action and of the name of the court to which the writ is returnable, and the others may join as parties plaintiff in the action within thirty days after such notification , and, if the others fail to join as a parties plaintiff, their right of action against such person shall abate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.