Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

253 Conn. 910

Amodio v. Amodio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 18, 2000

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2000-05-18

Relies on Amodio v. Amodio · McHugh v. McHugh

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-05-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Eckert v. Eckert (2008), Sachs v. Sachs (2000)

26 state decisions

160200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 459 (AC 15692), is granted, limited to the following issues:

*911The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16312.Donald L. Altschuler, in support of the petition.Decided May 18, 2000

¶2“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly exercised its authority under General Statutes § 46b-86 (a) and improperly applied McHugh v. McHugh, 27 Conn. App. 724, 609 A.2d 250 (1992)?

¶3“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the child support order in this case was nonmodifiable?”

¶4VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

/253/conn/910 · .json · Public domain