Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 F.2d 381 - Elmer S. Nelson and Mabel R. Nelson v. Thomas Brames and Marilyn C. Brames

Elmer S. Nelson and Mabel R. Nelson v. Thomas Brames and Marilyn C. Brames’s Empirical Analysis

253 F.2d 381 · 1958

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 1972
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1972

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

90195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School District · Larkins v. Kohlmeyer · Globe Cereal Mills v. Scrivener · Wallis v. Nauman · Elmer S. Nelson and Mabel R. Nelson v. Thomas Brames and Marilyn C. Brames

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * that the skidding itself is not ordinarily evidence of negligence, where it skids across the center line of the road to the left side thereof and collides with another; but the burden is upon the driver on the wrong side of the road to excuse or justify the violation of the law of the road. * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ * * * there is no actionable negligence where, without fault of the driver, a vehicle skids across the center line of a highway and collides with an approaching vehicle * * * ”,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.