Romey A. Gaiser v. Cyril S. Linder’s Empirical Analysis
253 F.2d 433 · 1958
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2005 · most notably Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Co. (1964), Perma Research & Development v. Singer Co. (1976)
11 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Henry St. Pierre v. Draper M. Harvey, Draper M. Harvey v. Henry St. Pierre · Burns v. Curtis · Kruger v. Resnick · Kendall v. Searles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he purpose for which the articles tested were designed was not to give uniform temperatures in a laboratory, but under service conditions in an airplane. It is entirely possible that a coating which would operate satisfactorily under laboratory conditions might fail to do so under the varying conditions of sun, wind, precipation, vibration, and pressure encountered in actual use.” At 435 of 253 F.2d.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.