Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 F.2d 95 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

253 F.2d 95 · 1958

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2001 · most notably Johnson v. United States (1961), Mares v. United States (1968)

30 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

150195819601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · United States v. Trenton Potteries Co. · United States v. Moran · Apodaca v. United States · United States v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the failure of the district attorney to sustain his opening statements could not be prejudicial to the defendant but rather to the government.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to lead on; to influence; to prevail on; to move by persuasion or influence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.