Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Bomar National, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
253 F.3d 1011 · 2001
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2023
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 4201 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 4202 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 4203 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1399 (§ 4219 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1401 (§ 4221 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Slotky · Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Lady Baltimore Foods, Inc. · Robbins v. McNicholas Transportation Co. · ITT Diversified Credit Corp. v. Lift & Equipment Service, Inc. · Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Ditello
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established that parties can agree to an interest rate other than the standard one contained in 28 U.S.C. § 1961.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.