Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 F.3d 1065 - United States of America v. Derick Catrell Robinson

United States of America v. Derick Catrell Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

253 F.3d 1065 · 2001

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
January 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Dusky v. United States · Drope v. Missouri · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Due process mandates that [the defendant is] entitled to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding and therefore be accorded a fair trial — not a perfect trial. Although [the defendant’s] cognitive deficits may have placed additional responsibility on his counsel to ensure [the defendant’s] understanding of the process, it certainly does not establish that he was incompetent to stand trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.