Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

253 F.3d 227

Docket No. 98-20385

Soffar v. Johnson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT

May 31, 2001

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2007

2 counsel of record

Relies on Max Alexander Soffar v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division · United States v. Hunt

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-05-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 21, 2000, 5 Cir., 2000, 237 F.3d 411)

Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Gary L. Johnson, and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting the rehearing en banc,

¶2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/253/f3d/227 · .json · Public domain