¶1 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Rafael Bat raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal of *431 fense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
253 F. App'x 430
United States v. Bat
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided November 8, 2007
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-11-08
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Almendarez-Torres v. United States · United States v. Pineda-Arrellano
Decided 2007-11-08