Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 FSUPP2D 587 - Nitke v. Ashcroft

Nitke v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 28 U.S.C. § 2284 · 47 U.S.C. § 223

Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Allen v. Wright · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Grayned v. City of Rockford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The essence of a claim of chill ... is an assertion that one has elected to refrain from speaking, rather than risk prosecution,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.