Coren v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1381A (§ 1602 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sims v. Apfel · Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Rodriguez Pagan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services · Samuel C. EVANGELISTA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee · Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and the Commissioner has applied the correct legal standard. See 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) ; Seavey v. Barnhart , 276 F.3d 1 , 9 (1st Cir. 2001). If those criteria are satisfied, the Court must uphold the Commissioner's decision even if the record could justify a different conclusion. Evangelista v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. , 826 F.2d 136 , 144 (1st Cir. 1987). Substantial evidence means evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Patoski v. Berryhill“), in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Patoski v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.