Fugitt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2015
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oregon v. Kennedy · Alcorta v. Texas · Patterson v. State · Fugitt v. State · Abdi v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Only where the governmental conduct in question is intended to “goad” the defendant into moving for a mistrial may a defendant raise the bar of double jeopardy to a second trial after having succeeded in aborting the first on his own motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[P]rosecutorial misconduct which deprives the defendant of due process of law causes the conviction to be set aside but does not preclude further proceedings against the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weems v. State“intent on the part of the prosecutor to subvert the protections afforded by the Double Jeopardy Clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fugitt v. Dg Lemacks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.