majority">Barnes, Judge.

Lloyd Mobley appeals from his conviction of driving with a suspended license, contending the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to go forward. Mobley asserts that the arresting officer failed *58to comply with the following requirement of OCGA § 40-5-121 (b) (1): “The charge of driving with a suspended or disqualified license shall not be made where the suspension is a result of a failure to respond under Code Section 40-5-56 or an insurance cancellation unless the arresting officer hás verified a service date and such date is placed on the uniform citation.” The record in this case shows that Mobley’s license was suspended under OCGA § 40-5-56 for failing to appear at a hearing for a traffic offense and that the officer arrested him for driving with a suspended license. Instead of issuing a citation to Mobley, however, the officer took him into custody and obtained an arrest warrant. Mobley was never given a uniform citation listing the service date nor a copy of his arrest warrant.

Decided December 14, 2001.Robert L. Mack, Jr., for appellant.Keith C. Martin, Solicitor-General, for appellee.

In State v. Brooks, 194 Ga. App. 465 (390 SE2d 673) (1990), we interpreted a broader predecessor to the current version of OCGA § 40-5-121 (b) (1) in a case in which the officer did not verify and place the service date on the uniform citation issued to the appellant. We held that “under the clear mandate of; . . the statute ... , no charge of driving with a suspended license could be made against appellant.” Id. at 466. As in Brooks, supra, “we may not sanction noncompliance [with the statute] because we perceive it to be unnecessary or cumbersome.” Id.

Judgment reversed.

Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur.

Citation profile

Relationships

How this case has been treated — in progress