Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 GAAPP 749 - Benedict v. Snead

Benedict v. Snead’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2019

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

4020022010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital Authority · Culwell v. Lomas & Nettleton Company · Labovitz v. Hopkinson · 220 Ga. App. 394 - Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. Smith & Jenkins, P. C. · Clayton v. Deverell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction shall be conclusive between the same parties and their privies as to all matters put in issue or which under the rules of law might have been put in issue in the cause wherein the judgment was rendered until the judgment is reversed or set aside.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]ntry of a judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties is not a final judgment under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) and lacks res judicata effect unless the trial court makes an express direction for the entry of the final judgment and a determination pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) that no just reason for delaying the finality of the judgment exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “applies to attempts by amended complaint to relitigate matters that were or could have been litigated in the same action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.