Ross v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins · City of Columbus, Ga. v. Myszka · 243 Ga. App. 449 - Szurovy v. Olderman · 222 Ga. App. 207 - Houston v. Surrett · 222 Ga. App. 62 - Morris v. Atlanta Legal Aid Society, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a case of this type, an attorney could consider expert opinion testimony given by an engineer and give an expert legal opinion that, if this engineering testimony had been presented in the underlying nuisance trial, it would have provided the evidence necessary for the jury to render a different verdict. But without expert engineering testimony to place in the context of the evidence produced in the nuisance trial, an attorney’s opinion that an engineer’s testimony would have produced a different verdict is pure conjecture and establishes nothing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.