State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bailey · State v. Taylor · State v. Phipps · State v. Wood · State v. Beebe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In State v. Beebe, 244 Kan. 48, 60-61 , 766 P.2d 158 (1988), this court concluded that PIK Crim. 2d 54.12 is an adequate statement of the statutory provision on voluntary intoxication. The instruction which the court approved stated: ‘ “Voluntary intoxication is not a defense to a criminal charge, but when a particular intent or other state of mind is a necessary element of the offense charged, intoxication may be taken into consideration in determining whether the accused was capable of forming the necessary intent or state of mind.” ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ludlow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.