Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 Kan. 384 - State v. Gibbens

State v. Gibbens’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Van Cleave · State v. Williams · State v. Richard · State v. Hamilton · State v. Harrold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We express no opinion on this issue as we conclude the issue is not properly before us for the following reasons: “1. The notice of appeal filed herein specifies that appeal is taken only from the sentences imposed. “2. The aggravated incest argument was never raised before the trial court; no motion to withdraw the pleas or arrest judgment was made; and no appeal was taken from any matter relating to the convictions themselves. “3. No authority is cited for the proposition that the aggravated incest-rape argument is a jurisdictional matter. The information on its face contains all allegations necessary for the conviction of the defendant on both counts of rape.” 253 Kan. at 387-88 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.