Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 LA 811 - Donald v. Glazer

Donald v. Glazer’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 1990
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 1990

14 state decisions

1001969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Clemmons · Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing Corporation · Ethridge v. Estate of Paul · Donald v. Glazer · 198 So. 2d 695 - FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NY v. Clemmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Court of Appeal held, in effect, that when this personal service partnership operating on a cash basis was dissolved, with no special agreement governing liquidation, the withdrawing partners lost their interests in the uncollected accounts receivable owed to the partnership on the date of dissolution. In so holding, we think the Court of Appeal erred. We do not, however, reach the merits of this holding.” 220 So.2d at 85”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When an application for a rehearing has been applied for timely: * * * (2) A judgment of a court of appeal becomes final and executory when the supreme court denies a timely application for a writ of certiorari in the case; * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.