Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 MINN 158 - State v. Taran

State v. Taran’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
March 1997
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1997

13 state decisions

6019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. . Scrugham · Doerr v. Warner · Church v. Church · Ryan v. Ebecke · Bubar v. Dizdar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is based on the theory that a court which first asserted jurisdiction will not be interfered with in the continuance of its assertion by another court of foreign jurisdiction until it is convenient and desirable that one give way to the other, and is not a rule of law, but one of practice, convenience, and expediency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Public policy requires that the courts be open and accessible to all persons who seek to have their claims submitted to litigation, and for this purpose nonresident parties ordinarily should be amenable to service of process. Immunity therefrom should be granted only for good and substantial reasons.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““No considerations of public policy, as we think, require that the accused should be exempt from being prosecuted civilly.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.