Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 MO 236 - Norton v. Reed

Norton v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 1993

19 state decisions

60191319201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nelson v. Brodhack · Feurt v. Caster · Ridgeway v. Holliday · Cruzen v. Stephens · Stark v. Kirchgraber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It follows that the plaintiffs might suffer a voluntary nonsuit, as they did without prejudice from the operation of the statute of limitations, provided they should begin a new action within one year after the nonsuit suffered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.