Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 MO 510 - State v. Gordon

State v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1955
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1955

10 state decisions

4019131920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ruck · State v. Snyder · State v. Rasco · State v. Spaugh · State v. Fields

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant insists that this remark was a direct reference to defendant's failure to testify in his own behalf. We cannot agree with appellant's contention. This was in the nature of a general comment as to the weight and effect of the evidence of the witness Bischoff, and it would be a forced construction that would interpret it as a reference to defendant's failure to testify.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.