Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

253 N.C. 171

116 S.E.2d 355

Wiggins v. Tripp

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1960

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1960-10-12

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1974

10 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““The appellant shall cause to be prepared a concise statement of the case, embodying the instructions of the judge as signed by him, if there be an exception thereto, and the request of the counsel of the parties for instructions if there be any exception on account of the granting or withholding thereof, and stating separately, in articles numbered, the errors alleged. A copy of this statemenfshall be served on the respondent within fifteen days from the entry of the appeal taken; ...” (Emphasis supplied,) ,”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Thurston v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment

Relies on Western North Carolina Conference v. . Tally · Gaither v. Carpenter. · Mitchell v. . Tedder

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1960-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WinboRne, C. J.

¶1 At the threshold of their appeal defendants are confronted with a motion to dismiss the appeal for that there is no case on appeal— and the record contains no request for the judge to settle a case on appeal.

¶2 The requirements are set forth in G.S. 1-282 and G.S. 1-283. The statute provides that the appellant shall cause to be prepared a concise statement of case on appeal and prescribes what it shall embody, and that a copy shall be served on respondent, appellee, within time given by statute or extended by order of court. It further provides that within time given in like manner respondent shall return the copy with his approval or with specific amendments endorsed or attached. If the case on appeal be returned by the respondent, with exceptions as prescribed, the appellant shall immediately request the judge to fix a time and place for settling the case before him. If, however, the appellant delays longer than fifteen days, unless time be enlarged by agreement after respondent serves his counter-ease or exceptions, to make such request, or delays for such period to mail the case and counter-case or exceptions to the judge, the exceptions filed by the respondent shall be allowed, or the counter-case served by him shall constitute the case on appeal.

¶3 However it is the duty of the appellant to have the statement of case on appeal as thus modified, redrafted and submitted to the judge for his signature. Gaither v. Carpenter, 143 N.C. 240, 55 S.E. 625. WNC Conference v. Tally, 229 N.C. 1, 47 S.E. 2d 467. “Moreover, when he fails to do so there is no 'case on appeal.’ Mitchell v. Tedder, 107 N.C. 358, 12 S.E. 193; Waller v. Dudley, 193 N.C. 749, 138 S.E. 128.”

¶4 Let it be noted that while this Court in response to motion suggesting diminution of the record, entered an order (1) granting time in which to serve? statement of case on appeal and time in which to serve exceptions or countercase, and (2) providing that if case on appeal should not be settled by agreement, same should be settled by Judge Bundy within given time, the order does not relieve appellant of duty of requesting the Judge to settle the case, and of *176 otherwise performing the duties imposed upon appellant by the statute. G.S. 1-282 and G.S. 1-283.

¶5 And where there is no proper statement of case on appeal, the Supreme Court can determine only whether there is error on 'the face of the record proper. WNC Conference v. Tally, supra.

¶6 Applying these provisions of the statutes interpreted, by decisions of this Court, error is not made to appear upon the face of the record. Therefore the motion to dismiss is well taken, and should be granted.

¶7 Appeal dismissed.

/253/nc/171 · .json · Public domain