Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 NW2D 395 - Fitzer v. Bloom

Fitzer v. Bloom’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2008 · most notably McClellan v. Tottenhoff (1983), McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. (1984)

27 state decisions

1601977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beck v. Groe · Fussner v. Andert · Trail v. Christian · Ross v. Ross · Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every husband, wife, child, parent, guardian, employer, or other person who is injured in person or property, or means of support, by any intoxicated person, or by the intoxication of any person, has a right of action, in his own name, against any person who, by illegally selling, bartering or giving intoxicating liquors, caused the intoxication of such person, for all damages, sustained; * * *.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““* * * Since the legislature has provided a remedy for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor in the Civil Damage Act, the legislature has preempted the field and has provided the exclusive remedy in the act. A common-law cause of action for negligence will only be allowed where the act does not apply.” Minn., 253 N.W.2d 403 . (Italics supplied.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.