Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 ORAPP 277 - State v. Bradley

State v. Bradley’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[e]vidence is cumulative when it demonstrates the same thing as other admitted evidence. See State v. Klein , 243 Or.App. 1 , 14, 15, 258 P.3d 528 (2011), aff'd , 352 Or. 302 [ 283 P.3d 350 ] (2012). Alternatively, evidence is not cumulative when it presents qualitatively different proof than other admitted evidence. Id. (excluded evidence was not 'different in nature' and, thus, was unlikely to have affected the verdict). In Davis , the court noted that the erroneous admission of evidence would be harmless 'if the particular issue to which the error pertains has no relationship to the jury's determination of its verdict,' or 'if the jury would have regarded the * * * evidence as duplicative or unhelpful to its deliberations.' 336 Or. at 32-33 [ 77 P.3d 1111 ]."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.