State v. Rennells’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'where counsel's failure to object was inadvertent or unintentional.' " Id. at 105-06, 429 P.3d 1049 (quoting Tenbusch v. Linn County , 172 Or. App. 172 , 177 n. 6, 18 P.3d 419 , rev. den. , 332 Or. 305 , 27 P.3d 1045 (2001) ). See, e.g. , State v. Rennells , 253 Or. App. 580 , 585, 291 P.3d 777 (2012), rev den , 353 Or. 410 , 298 P.3d 1226 (2013) ("[W]e agree with the state that any claim of error was not preserved and even, arguably, that any error was invited when defense counsel appeared to agree that the testimony established venue * * *.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“To be substantial, the pain must be ample or considerable and not fleeting or inconsequential.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.