Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

253 So. 2d 144

Berman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 12, 1971

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1971-10-12

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1987

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence entered by the trial court for a charged direct criminal contempt. The judgment and sentence must be reversed upon the authority of Moore v. State, Fla.App.1971, 24S So.2d 880. The state attempts to argue that there was a substantial compliance with rule 1.830, Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A., but the record reveals: (1) a failure to recite in the judgment those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based, (2) a failure to inform the defendant prior to adjudication *145of the accusation against him, (3) a failure to inquire as to whether the defendant had any cause to show why he should not be adjudged guilty, (4) a failure to give the defendant an opportunity to present evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances.

¶2Reversed.

/253/so2d/144 · .json · Public domain