Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 So. 2d 660 - King v. King

253 So. 2d 660 - King v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 1989
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Emmons v. Agricultural Insurance Company · Smith v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company · Fruehauf Trailer Company v. Baillio · Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell · General Motors Accept. Corp. v. Deep South Pest Con.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Assuming the husband's obtention of a separation on ground of abandonment precluded the wife's right to alimony following the divorce because the wife's fault was thereby established, the husband's remedy lay in an appeal in the divorce proceeding. In this instance, plaintiff-husband did not appeal the judgment which awarded appellant-wife alimony in the divorce proceeding. Said judgment has long since become final and precludes any further consideration of the incidental issue of appellant's alleged fault."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is elementary that an appeal can be taken only from a judgment which has been (emphasis added) formally signed, and the delays for appealing do not commence until a judgment is signed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.