Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 So. 2d 806 - Barrett v. State

253 So. 2d 806 - Barrett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 1998

10 state decisions

40197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. State · Poole v. State · National Casualty Co. v. Johnson · Garber v. Wright Cast Stone, Co. · Wilson v. Zook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Court instructs the jury for the State that if you believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Paul Sisk, while a duly elected and acting member of the Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, Mississippi, did cause to be approved and paid by Monroe County, Mississippi $2,714.67 or any sum exceeding $100.00 involving parts agreed upon by the jury, said parts being to a 112 Caterpillar Motorgrader, serial number 2M-148, the personal property of the defendant, said parts being converted to his personal use, thereby wilfully defrauding or attempting to defraud Monroe County, then you should find the defendant guilty of embezzlement and the form of your verdict may be: ‘We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It has always been, is now, and we trust ever shall be, the law in criminal cases that, where there are two reasonable hypotheses arising out of and supported by the evidence, it is the duty of the jury to adopt the hypothesis consistent with innocence, even though the hypothesis of guilt be the more probable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is doubtful that this Court has ever reviewed a criminal case which is based on circumstantial evidence in toto,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.