253 So. 3d 1314 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has cast an advocate's eye over the trial record and considered whether any ruling made by the trial court, subject to the contemporaneous objection rule, had a significant, adverse impact on shaping the evidence presented to the jury for its consideration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“with a basis for determining whether appointed counsel have fully performed their duty to support their clients' appeals to the best of their ability”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“in making the critical determination whether the appeal is indeed so frivolous that counsel should be permitted to withdraw.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.