¶2Damon Arnold challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction on one count of forgery, Section 570.090, RSMo 2000. For reasons explained in the Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).
253 S.W.3d 586
State v. Arnold
Decided May 27, 2008
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2008-05-27
Decided 2008-05-27