Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

253 S.W.3d 586

State v. Arnold

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 2008

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2008-05-27

Decided 2008-05-27

¶1*587ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Damon Arnold challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction on one count of forgery, Section 570.090, RSMo 2000. For reasons explained in the Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

/253/sw3d/586 · .json · Public domain