Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 253 SW3D 834 - Pitonyak v. State

Pitonyak v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 147th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Sandstrom v. Montana · Mincey v. Arizona · Scott v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a search warrant is issued on the basis of an affidavit containing unlawfully obtained information, the evidence seized under the warrant is admissible only if the warrant clearly could have been issued on the basis of the untainted information in the affidavit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the tainted information was clearly unnecessary to establish probable cause for the search warrant, then the defendant could not have been harmed by the inclusion of the tainted information in the affidavit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement - and the exceptions to that requirement - to the conduct of private persons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.