Pitonyak v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 147th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Sandstrom v. Montana · Mincey v. Arizona · Scott v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a search warrant is issued on the basis of an affidavit containing unlawfully obtained information, the evidence seized under the warrant is admissible only if the warrant clearly could have been issued on the basis of the untainted information in the affidavit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BRACKENS v. State“If the tainted information was clearly unnecessary to establish probable cause for the search warrant, then the defendant could not have been harmed by the inclusion of the tainted information in the affidavit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BRACKENS v. State“the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement - and the exceptions to that requirement - to the conduct of private persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ruiz, Lauro Eduardo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.