Three Way Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Citizens for Allegan County, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission · Wilson v. Kelley · Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc. · National Classification Committee v. United States · Household Goods Carriers' Bureau v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the proposed pooling agreement modification [was] not a matter of major transportation importance and that there [was] no substantial likelihood that the proposed modification [would] unduly restrain competition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to continue the use of any operating authority as a carrier of household goods within the territory authorized to be served by the agent under a certificate issued by the Commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“not a matter of major transportation importance and that there is no substantial likelihood that the proposed modification will unduly restrain competition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.