¶1Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The order is affirmed because the evidence discloses no property of the defendant subject to receivership. All concur. (The order denies a motion by the judgment creditor for the appointment of a receiver for the property of the judgment debtor.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
254 A.D. 629
Berman v. Goldstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 9, 1938
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1938-03-09
Decided 1938-03-09