254 Cal. App. 2d 878 - People v. Hooker’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2010
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Neal v. State of California · 58 Cal. 2d 748 - People v. McFarland · People v. Coffey · 63 Cal. 2d 822 - Kellett v. Superior Court · 59 Cal. 2d 503 - People v. Ketchel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]ecause of the nature of their employment public officers are under a special duty at all times to use their best efforts to apprehend criminals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“engaged in the performance of his duties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.