State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Connick v. Myers · State v. Golding · 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island · Wisconsin v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fact finder may consider the language used in the communication in determining ... that the defendant intended to harass, annoy or alarm, and that he did so in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Clearly the Connecticut statute regulates conduct, not mere speech. What is proscribed is the making of a telephone call, with the requisite intent and in the specified manner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.