Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 F.1d 222 - Ex parte Tinkoff

Ex parte Tinkoff’s Empirical Analysis

254 F. 222 · 1918

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
December 1953
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1953

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

7019181920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Japanese Immigrant Case · United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-One · Handley v. Stutz · Angelus v. Sullivan · Lancaster

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.