Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 254 F.1d 244 - Smith v. Douglas County

Smith v. Douglas County’s Empirical Analysis

254 F. 244 · 1918

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 1970
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1970

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

701918192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boom Company v. Patterson · Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Myers · Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining Company · Hess v. Reynolds · Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to hear and determine all questions in relation to all taxes arising under this article.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.